State Senate District 25
Ches. Bay/Piedmont
Partisan Lean of SD25 voters
Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
Details
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
|
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin
|
54,967 | 62.00% |
|
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe
|
33,071 | 37.30% |
|
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding
|
567 | 0.64% |
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 30,764 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Caroline County
Election Day Votes: 73.2%
Early In-Person Votes: 20.0%
Mail Ballots: 6.8%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 6,910 | 57.39% |
| McAuliffe | 5,031 | 41.79% |
| Blanding | 91 | 0.76% |
Actual
results for Caroline County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of Caroline County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 1,278 | 53.10% |
| Youngkin | 1,112 | 46.20% |
| Blanding | 15 | 0.62% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 596 | 72.59% |
| Youngkin | 213 | 25.94% |
| Blanding | 10 | 1.22% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 612 | 75.56% |
| McAuliffe | 196 | 24.20% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.25% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 520 | 74.71% |
| McAuliffe | 173 | 24.86% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.29% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 395 | 56.83% |
| McAuliffe | 297 | 42.73% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.29% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 603 | 65.05% |
| McAuliffe | 312 | 33.66% |
| Blanding | 12 | 1.29% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 273 | 63.79% |
| McAuliffe | 152 | 35.51% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.70% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 722 | 69.02% |
| McAuliffe | 319 | 30.50% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.48% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 537 | 52.19% |
| McAuliffe | 481 | 46.74% |
| Blanding | 10 | 0.97% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 202 | 50.00% |
| Youngkin | 200 | 49.50% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.50% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 347 | 51.41% |
| McAuliffe | 316 | 46.81% |
| Blanding | 12 | 1.78% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 397 | 69.28% |
| McAuliffe | 173 | 30.19% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.52% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 568 | 63.32% |
| McAuliffe | 321 | 35.79% |
| Blanding | 7 | 0.78% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 411 | 65.03% |
| McAuliffe | 215 | 34.02% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.95% |
Essex County
Election Day Votes: 58.4%
Early In-Person Votes: 36.1%
Mail Ballots: 5.5%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 2,682 | 57.00% |
| McAuliffe | 1,978 | 42.04% |
| Blanding | 40 | 0.85% |
Actual
results for Essex County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of Essex County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 902 | 53.06% |
| McAuliffe | 786 | 46.24% |
| Blanding | 10 | 0.59% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 175 | 67.57% |
| Youngkin | 78 | 30.12% |
| Blanding | 4 | 1.54% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 318 | 55.21% |
| McAuliffe | 251 | 43.58% |
| Blanding | 6 | 1.04% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 334 | 53.61% |
| Youngkin | 282 | 45.26% |
| Blanding | 7 | 1.12% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 632 | 73.66% |
| McAuliffe | 224 | 26.11% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.23% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 470 | 68.21% |
| McAuliffe | 208 | 30.19% |
| Blanding | 11 | 1.60% |
King & Queen County
Election Day Votes: 75.6%
Early In-Person Votes: 17.8%
Mail Ballots: 6.6%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,687 | 65.16% |
| McAuliffe | 889 | 34.34% |
| Blanding | 14 | 0.54% |
Estimated
results for King & Queen County.
Methodology
King & Queen County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of King & Queen County that falls within SD25.
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 281 | 61.09% |
| McAuliffe | 179 | 38.91% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.22% |
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 105 | 61.40% |
| Youngkin | 64 | 37.43% |
| Blanding | 2 | 1.17% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 270 | 53.05% |
| McAuliffe | 236 | 46.37% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.59% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 395 | 75.24% |
| McAuliffe | 129 | 24.57% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.19% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 307 | 65.04% |
| McAuliffe | 159 | 33.69% |
| Blanding | 6 | 1.27% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 370 | 81.86% |
| McAuliffe | 81 | 17.92% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.22% |
King George County
Election Day Votes: 56.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 37.1%
Mail Ballots: 6.4%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 7,280 | 68.11% |
| McAuliffe | 3,310 | 30.97% |
| Blanding | 92 | 0.86% |
Actual
results for King George County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of King George County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 2,566 | 64.75% |
| McAuliffe | 1,375 | 34.70% |
| Blanding | 19 | 0.48% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 456 | 66.96% |
| Youngkin | 208 | 30.54% |
| Blanding | 16 | 2.35% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 930 | 76.86% |
| McAuliffe | 272 | 22.48% |
| Blanding | 8 | 0.66% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 544 | 73.51% |
| McAuliffe | 194 | 26.22% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.27% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,088 | 78.84% |
| McAuliffe | 275 | 19.93% |
| Blanding | 16 | 1.16% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 884 | 67.43% |
| McAuliffe | 413 | 31.50% |
| Blanding | 13 | 0.99% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,060 | 75.55% |
| McAuliffe | 325 | 23.16% |
| Blanding | 18 | 1.28% |
King William County
Election Day Votes: 75.2%
Early In-Person Votes: 20.6%
Mail Ballots: 4.3%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 6,285 | 73.33% |
| McAuliffe | 2,247 | 26.22% |
| Blanding | 34 | 0.40% |
Actual
results for King William County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of King William County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,146 | 65.04% |
| McAuliffe | 613 | 34.79% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.17% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 223 | 60.93% |
| Youngkin | 143 | 39.07% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 865 | 69.93% |
| McAuliffe | 358 | 28.94% |
| Blanding | 14 | 1.13% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 411 | 81.39% |
| McAuliffe | 93 | 18.42% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.20% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 520 | 73.55% |
| McAuliffe | 182 | 25.74% |
| Blanding | 4 | 0.57% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,073 | 83.83% |
| McAuliffe | 200 | 15.63% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.47% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,120 | 80.17% |
| McAuliffe | 269 | 19.26% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.36% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,007 | 76.46% |
| McAuliffe | 309 | 23.46% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.08% |
Lancaster County
Election Day Votes: 61.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 32.1%
Mail Ballots: 6.4%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 3,446 | 58.72% |
| McAuliffe | 2,404 | 40.96% |
| Blanding | 16 | 0.27% |
Actual
results for Lancaster County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of Lancaster County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,000 | 53.11% |
| McAuliffe | 878 | 46.63% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.16% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 243 | 64.29% |
| Youngkin | 131 | 34.66% |
| Blanding | 4 | 1.06% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 480 | 73.39% |
| McAuliffe | 172 | 26.30% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.15% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 280 | 52.73% |
| McAuliffe | 250 | 47.08% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.19% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 434 | 70.00% |
| McAuliffe | 183 | 29.52% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.48% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 226 | 74.59% |
| McAuliffe | 77 | 25.41% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 330 | 55.09% |
| Youngkin | 267 | 44.57% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.33% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 628 | 69.70% |
| McAuliffe | 271 | 30.08% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.22% |
Middlesex County
Election Day Votes: 67.9%
Early In-Person Votes: 26.7%
Mail Ballots: 5.4%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 3,701 | 65.98% |
| McAuliffe | 1,858 | 33.13% |
| Blanding | 47 | 0.84% |
Actual
results for Middlesex County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of Middlesex County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 880 | 58.67% |
| McAuliffe | 610 | 40.67% |
| Blanding | 10 | 0.67% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 211 | 70.10% |
| Youngkin | 87 | 28.90% |
| Blanding | 3 | 1.00% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 153 | 69.86% |
| McAuliffe | 64 | 29.22% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.91% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 334 | 68.72% |
| McAuliffe | 150 | 30.86% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.41% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 744 | 77.66% |
| McAuliffe | 212 | 22.13% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.21% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 444 | 64.72% |
| McAuliffe | 224 | 32.65% |
| Blanding | 18 | 2.62% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 418 | 67.53% |
| McAuliffe | 192 | 31.02% |
| Blanding | 8 | 1.29% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 641 | 76.31% |
| McAuliffe | 195 | 23.21% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.24% |
Northumberland County
Election Day Votes: 58.8%
Early In-Person Votes: 35.4%
Mail Ballots: 5.8%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 4,165 | 64.02% |
| McAuliffe | 2,304 | 35.41% |
| Blanding | 37 | 0.57% |
Actual
results for Northumberland County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of Northumberland County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,309 | 56.89% |
| McAuliffe | 985 | 42.81% |
| Blanding | 7 | 0.30% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 257 | 67.81% |
| Youngkin | 121 | 31.93% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.26% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 452 | 73.74% |
| McAuliffe | 157 | 25.61% |
| Blanding | 4 | 0.65% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 554 | 75.48% |
| McAuliffe | 172 | 23.43% |
| Blanding | 8 | 1.09% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 267 | 57.42% |
| Youngkin | 192 | 41.29% |
| Blanding | 6 | 1.29% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 769 | 74.37% |
| McAuliffe | 259 | 25.05% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.58% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 768 | 78.37% |
| McAuliffe | 207 | 21.12% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.51% |
Richmond County
Election Day Votes: 61.3%
Early In-Person Votes: 0.0%
Mail Ballots: 38.7%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 2,225 | 69.90% |
| McAuliffe | 936 | 29.41% |
| Blanding | 20 | 0.63% |
Actual
results for Richmond County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of Richmond County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 0 | 0.00% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
| McAuliffe | 0 | 0.00% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 722 | 58.65% |
| McAuliffe | 503 | 40.86% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.49% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 174 | 56.86% |
| McAuliffe | 126 | 41.18% |
| Blanding | 4 | 1.31% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 308 | 81.48% |
| McAuliffe | 67 | 17.72% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.79% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 237 | 75.48% |
| McAuliffe | 77 | 24.52% |
| Blanding | 0 | 0.00% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 396 | 80.65% |
| McAuliffe | 92 | 18.74% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.61% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 388 | 83.80% |
| McAuliffe | 71 | 15.33% |
| Blanding | 4 | 0.86% |
Spotsylvania County
Election Day Votes: 63.9%
Early In-Person Votes: 28.0%
Mail Ballots: 8.1%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 11,977 | 56.26% |
| McAuliffe | 9,152 | 42.99% |
| Blanding | 146 | 0.69% |
Estimated
results for Spotsylvania County.
Methodology
Spotsylvania County contains "split" precincts (*) for SD25.
Explain
Spotsylvania County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Spotsylvania County that falls within SD25.
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 3,188 | 53.56% |
| McAuliffe | 2,739 | 46.02% |
| Blanding | 24 | 0.40% |
These are estimated results.
Methodology
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 1,305 | 75.56% |
| Youngkin | 396 | 22.93% |
| Blanding | 25 | 1.45% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,057 | 82.84% |
| McAuliffe | 214 | 16.77% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.39% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,010 | 80.35% |
| McAuliffe | 240 | 19.09% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.48% |
This is a "split" precinct.
Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 351 | 67.89% |
| McAuliffe | 163 | 31.53% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.58% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 825 | 65.01% |
| McAuliffe | 431 | 33.96% |
| Blanding | 12 | 0.95% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 918 | 57.02% |
| McAuliffe | 677 | 42.05% |
| Blanding | 13 | 0.81% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 791 | 51.63% |
| McAuliffe | 731 | 47.72% |
| Blanding | 8 | 0.52% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 808 | 54.67% |
| McAuliffe | 654 | 44.25% |
| Blanding | 14 | 0.95% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 572 | 55.37% |
| McAuliffe | 446 | 43.18% |
| Blanding | 14 | 1.36% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 753 | 54.76% |
| McAuliffe | 611 | 44.44% |
| Blanding | 10 | 0.73% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 367 | 54.45% |
| McAuliffe | 300 | 44.51% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.89% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 941 | 59.26% |
| McAuliffe | 641 | 40.37% |
| Blanding | 6 | 0.38% |
Westmoreland County
Election Day Votes: 66.8%
Early In-Person Votes: 26.1%
Mail Ballots: 7.0%
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 4,609 | 60.60% |
| McAuliffe | 2,962 | 38.94% |
| Blanding | 30 | 0.39% |
Actual
results for Westmoreland County.
Methodology
SD25 includes all of Westmoreland County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 1,122 | 56.41% |
| McAuliffe | 863 | 43.39% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.15% |
These are actual results for SD25.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 391 | 73.36% |
| Youngkin | 140 | 26.27% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.38% |
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| McAuliffe | 324 | 60.11% |
| Youngkin | 213 | 39.52% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.37% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 149 | 54.78% |
| McAuliffe | 122 | 44.85% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.37% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 336 | 55.45% |
| McAuliffe | 268 | 44.22% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.33% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 301 | 72.88% |
| McAuliffe | 111 | 26.88% |
| Blanding | 1 | 0.24% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 291 | 66.90% |
| McAuliffe | 140 | 32.18% |
| Blanding | 2 | 0.46% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 348 | 69.88% |
| McAuliffe | 147 | 29.52% |
| Blanding | 3 | 0.60% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 955 | 80.25% |
| McAuliffe | 230 | 19.33% |
| Blanding | 5 | 0.42% |
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
| Candidate | Votes | Percent Reporting |
|---|---|---|
| Youngkin | 754 | 66.67% |
| McAuliffe | 366 | 32.36% |
| Blanding | 9 | 0.80% |
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.
Source:
Virginia Department of Elections