House of Delegates District 82

Capital
Competitive

Partisan Lean of HD82 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin
16,516 50.62%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe
15,834 48.53%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding
259 0.79%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 12,380 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Dinwiddie County
Election Day Votes: 66.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 27.8%
Mail Ballots: 5.7%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 6,543 63.38%
McAuliffe 3,718 36.02%
Blanding 57 0.55%
Estimated results for Dinwiddie County.
Dinwiddie County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Dinwiddie County that falls within HD82.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,659 57.80%
McAuliffe 1,197 41.71%
Blanding 14 0.49%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 401 67.97%
Youngkin 179 30.34%
Blanding 10 1.69%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 356 84.76%
McAuliffe 63 15.00%
Blanding 1 0.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 453 84.04%
McAuliffe 85 15.77%
Blanding 1 0.19%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 768 88.58%
McAuliffe 98 11.30%
Blanding 1 0.12%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 221 51.52%
Youngkin 203 47.32%
Blanding 5 1.17%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 738 69.95%
McAuliffe 309 29.29%
Blanding 7 0.66%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 331 80.34%
McAuliffe 79 19.17%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 416 72.22%
McAuliffe 157 27.26%
Blanding 3 0.52%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 430 61.34%
McAuliffe 267 38.09%
Blanding 4 0.57%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 539 71.96%
McAuliffe 206 27.50%
Blanding 3 0.40%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 82 63.08%
Youngkin 45 34.62%
Blanding 2 1.54%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 553 56.14%
Youngkin 426 43.25%
Blanding 6 0.61%
Petersburg City
Election Day Votes: 54.0%
Early In-Person Votes: 30.2%
Mail Ballots: 15.8%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 7,576 84.90%
Youngkin 1,205 13.50%
Blanding 139 1.56%
Actual results for Petersburg City.
HD82 includes all of Petersburg City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD82.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 2,297 85.33%
Youngkin 371 13.78%
Blanding 24 0.89%

These are actual results for HD82.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,284 91.06%
Youngkin 97 6.88%
Blanding 30 2.13%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 413 80.51%
Youngkin 90 17.54%
Blanding 10 1.95%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 839 88.41%
Youngkin 91 9.59%
Blanding 18 1.90%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 738 74.17%
Youngkin 238 23.92%
Blanding 18 1.81%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 460 73.95%
Youngkin 150 24.12%
Blanding 12 1.93%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 477 87.20%
Youngkin 56 10.24%
Blanding 13 2.38%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 425 91.40%
Youngkin 33 7.10%
Blanding 7 1.51%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 643 88.08%
Youngkin 79 10.82%
Blanding 7 0.96%
Prince George County
Election Day Votes: 64.0%
Early In-Person Votes: 30.4%
Mail Ballots: 5.6%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 6,998 71.07%
McAuliffe 2,784 28.28%
Blanding 53 0.54%
Estimated results for Prince George County.
Prince George County contains "split" precincts (*) for HD82. Explain
Prince George County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Prince George County that falls within HD82.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 2,057 68.66%
McAuliffe 926 30.91%
Blanding 9 0.30%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 318 57.50%
Youngkin 223 40.33%
Blanding 11 1.99%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 442 72.22%
McAuliffe 167 27.29%
Blanding 1 0.16%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,382 82.66%
McAuliffe 283 16.93%
Blanding 7 0.42%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 661 66.17%
McAuliffe 331 33.13%
Blanding 5 0.50%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 358 87.32%
McAuliffe 51 12.44%
Blanding 1 0.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 771 71.52%
McAuliffe 301 27.92%
Blanding 5 0.46%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 700 71.87%
McAuliffe 263 27.00%
Blanding 10 1.03%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 353 77.07%
McAuliffe 102 22.27%
Blanding 3 0.66%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 51 54.26%
McAuliffe 42 44.68%
Blanding 1 1.06%
Surry County
Election Day Votes: 64.1%
Early In-Person Votes: 27.5%
Mail Ballots: 8.4%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,770 50.06%
McAuliffe 1,756 49.66%
Blanding 10 0.28%
Actual results for Surry County.
HD82 includes all of Surry County, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD82.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 553 56.95%
Youngkin 418 43.05%
Blanding 1 0.10%

These are actual results for HD82.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 235 78.86%
Youngkin 64 21.48%
Blanding 1 0.34%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 297 69.88%
McAuliffe 127 29.88%
Blanding 1 0.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 238 52.42%
McAuliffe 214 47.14%
Blanding 2 0.44%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 264 58.02%
McAuliffe 186 40.88%
Blanding 4 0.88%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 271 55.08%
McAuliffe 220 44.72%
Blanding 1 0.20%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 193 59.57%
McAuliffe 129 39.81%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 92 78.63%
Youngkin 25 21.37%
Blanding 0 0.00%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.