House of Delegates District 74

Capital
Leans Republican
District Profile
Elections
Precinct Results
Redistricting

Partisan Lean of HD74 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin 		21,081 61.22%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe 		13,080 37.99%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding 		248 0.72%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 15,295 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Chesterfield County
Election Day Votes: 55.6%
Early In-Person Votes: 34.1%
Mail Ballots: 10.3%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 16,169 58.31%
McAuliffe 11,351 40.93%
Blanding 194 0.70%
Estimated results for Chesterfield County.
Chesterfield County contains "split" precincts (*) for HD74. Explain
Chesterfield County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Chesterfield County that falls within HD74.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 5,590 59.16%
McAuliffe 3,821 40.44%
Blanding 36 0.38%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,819 63.56%
Youngkin 1,006 35.15%
Blanding 34 1.19%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 718 51.65%
McAuliffe 655 47.12%
Blanding 16 1.15%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 480 64.17%
McAuliffe 258 34.49%
Blanding 10 1.34%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 464 52.25%
McAuliffe 422 47.52%
Blanding 2 0.23%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 423 50.66%
McAuliffe 400 47.90%
Blanding 11 1.32%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 480 60.68%
McAuliffe 303 38.31%
Blanding 8 1.01%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,004 68.35%
McAuliffe 457 31.11%
Blanding 7 0.48%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 603 69.55%
Youngkin 251 28.95%
Blanding 10 1.15%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 292 64.60%
McAuliffe 158 34.96%
Blanding 2 0.44%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 805 61.97%
McAuliffe 484 37.26%
Blanding 8 0.62%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 779 79.09%
McAuliffe 202 20.51%
Blanding 4 0.41%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 411 80.91%
McAuliffe 94 18.50%
Blanding 3 0.59%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 207 51.11%
Youngkin 194 47.90%
Blanding 4 0.99%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 531 82.71%
McAuliffe 106 16.51%
Blanding 4 0.62%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 972 74.26%
McAuliffe 324 24.75%
Blanding 12 0.92%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 820 61.42%
McAuliffe 496 37.15%
Blanding 18 1.35%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 640 62.08%
McAuliffe 387 37.54%
Blanding 4 0.39%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 309 66.45%
McAuliffe 155 33.33%
Blanding 1 0.22%
Colonial Heights City
Election Day Votes: 55.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 38.0%
Mail Ballots: 6.5%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 4,912 73.27%
McAuliffe 1,729 25.79%
Blanding 54 0.81%
Actual results for Colonial Heights City.
HD74 includes all of Colonial Heights City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD74.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,965 77.09%
McAuliffe 570 22.36%
Blanding 13 0.51%

These are actual results for HD74.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 216 49.66%
McAuliffe 210 48.28%
Blanding 9 2.07%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 438 73.61%
McAuliffe 151 25.38%
Blanding 4 0.67%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 479 72.36%
McAuliffe 175 26.44%
Blanding 7 1.06%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 539 72.06%
McAuliffe 198 26.47%
Blanding 8 1.07%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 550 69.97%
McAuliffe 224 28.50%
Blanding 11 1.40%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 725 78.04%
McAuliffe 201 21.64%
Blanding 2 0.22%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.