House of Delegates District 69

Hampton Roads
Leans Republican
District Profile
Elections
Precinct Results
Redistricting

Partisan Lean of HD69 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin 		21,301 55.87%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe 		16,609 43.56%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding 		208 0.55%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 18,001 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Gloucester County
Election Day Votes: 72.1%
Early In-Person Votes: 22.6%
Mail Ballots: 5.4%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 2,338 67.93%
McAuliffe 1,078 31.32%
Blanding 24 0.70%
Estimated results for Gloucester County.
Gloucester County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Gloucester County that falls within HD69.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 450 57.99%
McAuliffe 320 41.24%
Blanding 5 0.64%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 126 68.11%
Youngkin 57 30.81%
Blanding 2 1.08%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 978 74.66%
McAuliffe 323 24.66%
Blanding 8 0.61%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 853 72.84%
McAuliffe 309 26.39%
Blanding 9 0.77%
James City County
Election Day Votes: 45.4%
Early In-Person Votes: 45.0%
Mail Ballots: 9.6%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 5,777 49.98%
McAuliffe 5,731 49.58%
Blanding 51 0.44%
Estimated results for James City County.
James City County contains "split" precincts (*) for HD69. Explain
James City County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of James City County that falls within HD69.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 2,736 52.67%
Youngkin 2,449 47.14%
Blanding 13 0.25%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 835 75.02%
Youngkin 270 24.26%
Blanding 8 0.72%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 736 60.98%
McAuliffe 466 38.61%
Blanding 3 0.25%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 381 59.53%
McAuliffe 257 40.16%
Blanding 2 0.31%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 403 62.97%
Youngkin 233 36.41%
Blanding 4 0.63%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 920 72.27%
McAuliffe 350 27.49%
Blanding 3 0.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 155 61.02%
Youngkin 94 37.01%
Blanding 5 1.97%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 694 56.15%
McAuliffe 529 42.80%
Blanding 13 1.05%
Newport News City
Election Day Votes: 69.8%
Early In-Person Votes: 20.4%
Mail Ballots: 9.8%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,218 72.37%
Youngkin 444 26.38%
Blanding 20 1.19%
Estimated results for Newport News City.
Newport News City contains "split" precincts (*) for HD69. Explain
Newport News City set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Newport News City that falls within HD69.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 277 80.76%
Youngkin 63 18.37%
Blanding 2 0.58%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 155 93.94%
Youngkin 7 4.24%
Blanding 3 1.82%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 91 58.33%
Youngkin 63 40.38%
Blanding 2 1.28%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 695 68.20%
Youngkin 311 30.52%
Blanding 13 1.28%
York County
Election Day Votes: 52.3%
Early In-Person Votes: 40.8%
Mail Ballots: 6.8%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 12,742 59.42%
McAuliffe 8,582 40.02%
Blanding 113 0.53%
Estimated results for York County.
York County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of York County that falls within HD69.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 4,866 55.58%
McAuliffe 3,861 44.10%
Blanding 28 0.32%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,033 70.32%
Youngkin 414 28.18%
Blanding 21 1.43%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 532 56.30%
McAuliffe 406 42.96%
Blanding 6 0.63%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 701 63.21%
McAuliffe 397 35.80%
Blanding 10 0.90%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 752 51.05%
Youngkin 713 48.40%
Blanding 7 0.48%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 499 62.22%
McAuliffe 303 37.78%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,430 82.52%
McAuliffe 296 17.08%
Blanding 6 0.35%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 642 68.88%
McAuliffe 286 30.69%
Blanding 4 0.43%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 673 56.32%
McAuliffe 503 42.09%
Blanding 18 1.51%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 947 76.56%
McAuliffe 282 22.80%
Blanding 7 0.57%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 892 75.66%
McAuliffe 282 23.92%
Blanding 5 0.42%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 433 70.41%
McAuliffe 181 29.43%
Blanding 1 0.16%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.