House of Delegates District 54

Piedmont
Strong Democratic
District Profile
Elections
Precinct Results
Redistricting

Partisan Lean of HD54 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe 		24,228 79.15%
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin 		6,054 19.78%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding 		301 0.98%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 11,897 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Albemarle County
Election Day Votes: 61.5%
Early In-Person Votes: 26.4%
Mail Ballots: 12.2%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 9,899 74.32%
Youngkin 3,288 24.68%
Blanding 128 0.96%
Estimated results for Albemarle County.
Albemarle County contains "split" precincts (*) for HD54. Explain
Albemarle County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Albemarle County that falls within HD54.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 2,852 81.18%
Youngkin 635 18.08%
Blanding 23 0.65%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,556 96.11%
Youngkin 51 3.15%
Blanding 21 1.30%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 775 60.36%
Youngkin 493 38.40%
Blanding 15 1.17%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 249 66.05%
Youngkin 122 32.36%
Blanding 5 1.33%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 591 67.70%
Youngkin 270 30.93%
Blanding 9 1.03%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 922 69.01%
Youngkin 408 30.54%
Blanding 6 0.45%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 491 75.31%
Youngkin 149 22.85%
Blanding 11 1.69%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 688 70.06%
Youngkin 281 28.62%
Blanding 11 1.12%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 13 56.52%
Youngkin 9 39.13%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 815 70.02%
Youngkin 338 29.04%
Blanding 10 0.86%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 22 59.46%
McAuliffe 14 37.84%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 369 66.13%
Youngkin 177 31.72%
Blanding 12 2.15%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 508 63.34%
Youngkin 289 36.03%
Blanding 5 0.62%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 56 56.00%
Youngkin 44 44.00%
Blanding 0 0.00%
Charlottesville City
Election Day Votes: 60.9%
Early In-Person Votes: 26.2%
Mail Ballots: 12.9%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 14,329 82.88%
Youngkin 2,766 16.00%
Blanding 173 1.00%
Actual results for Charlottesville City.
HD54 includes all of Charlottesville City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD54.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 4,010 88.50%
Youngkin 492 10.86%
Blanding 28 0.62%

These are actual results for HD54.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,997 89.39%
Youngkin 200 8.95%
Blanding 33 1.48%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,042 79.18%
Youngkin 255 19.38%
Blanding 16 1.22%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,210 81.15%
Youngkin 260 17.44%
Blanding 17 1.14%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 950 85.20%
Youngkin 152 13.63%
Blanding 13 1.17%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,289 74.12%
Youngkin 437 25.13%
Blanding 11 0.63%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 924 84.38%
Youngkin 153 13.97%
Blanding 17 1.55%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 1,188 74.95%
Youngkin 371 23.41%
Blanding 23 1.45%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 496 82.12%
Youngkin 98 16.23%
Blanding 8 1.32%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 545 85.69%
Youngkin 90 14.15%
Blanding 1 0.16%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 678 71.90%
Youngkin 258 27.36%
Blanding 6 0.64%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.