House of Delegates District 48

Southside Va.
Strong Republican
District Profile
Elections
Precinct Results
Redistricting

Partisan Lean of HD48 voters

Based on 2021 Governor's Race
Results are based on estimated absentee votes.
The state Department of Elections does not publish results by state legislative district. VPAP has developed what it believes to be reasonable estimates for calcuating the results by legislative district. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Republican Candidate
Glenn Youngkin 		21,958 67.83%
Democrat Candidate
Terry McAuliffe 		10,254 31.68%
Liberation Party Candidate
Princess Blanding 		151 0.47%
Election-Day Ballots Mapped by Precinct
The results on this map are incomplete and do not include an estimated 8,018 early ballots.
>+20D
0 to +20D
0 to +20R
>+20R
Henry County
Election Day Votes: 71.1%
Early In-Person Votes: 22.7%
Mail Ballots: 6.1%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 8,246 66.17%
McAuliffe 4,151 33.31%
Blanding 56 0.45%
Estimated results for Henry County.
Henry County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Henry County that falls within HD48.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,654 58.40%
McAuliffe 1,169 41.28%
Blanding 9 0.32%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 504 65.97%
Youngkin 254 33.25%
Blanding 7 0.92%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 239 74.22%
McAuliffe 81 25.16%
Blanding 2 0.62%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 560 74.77%
McAuliffe 187 24.97%
Blanding 1 0.13%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 246 63.90%
Youngkin 134 34.81%
Blanding 4 1.04%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 281 63.29%
McAuliffe 163 36.71%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 476 69.79%
McAuliffe 202 29.62%
Blanding 4 0.59%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 389 56.05%
McAuliffe 302 43.52%
Blanding 3 0.43%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 305 70.93%
McAuliffe 121 28.14%
Blanding 4 0.93%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 313 80.46%
McAuliffe 74 19.02%
Blanding 2 0.51%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 293 71.46%
McAuliffe 115 28.05%
Blanding 2 0.49%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 526 74.82%
McAuliffe 174 24.75%
Blanding 1 0.14%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 277 65.18%
McAuliffe 147 34.59%
Blanding 1 0.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 430 83.33%
McAuliffe 84 16.28%
Blanding 2 0.39%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 260 78.31%
McAuliffe 70 21.08%
Blanding 1 0.30%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 482 74.27%
McAuliffe 159 24.50%
Blanding 7 1.08%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 198 70.46%
McAuliffe 80 28.47%
Blanding 2 0.71%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 669 81.19%
McAuliffe 151 18.33%
Blanding 3 0.36%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 506 80.32%
McAuliffe 122 19.37%
Blanding 1 0.16%
Martinsville City
Election Day Votes: 69.7%
Early In-Person Votes: 20.2%
Mail Ballots: 10.0%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 2,215 56.28%
Youngkin 1,689 42.91%
Blanding 40 1.02%
Actual results for Martinsville City.
HD48 includes all of Martinsville City, making it possible to get accurate gubernatorial results for that portion of the district.


These are actual results for HD48.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 425 53.39%
Youngkin 365 45.85%
Blanding 4 0.50%

These are actual results for HD48.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 317 80.25%
Youngkin 84 21.27%
Blanding 7 1.77%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 241 94.14%
Youngkin 13 5.08%
Blanding 2 0.78%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 297 51.74%
McAuliffe 268 46.69%
Blanding 8 1.39%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 170 57.05%
Youngkin 124 41.61%
Blanding 4 1.34%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 356 61.49%
Youngkin 217 37.48%
Blanding 6 1.04%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 583 65.29%
McAuliffe 300 33.59%
Blanding 8 0.90%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 138 95.17%
Youngkin 6 4.14%
Blanding 1 0.69%
Pittsylvania County
Election Day Votes: 79.8%
Early In-Person Votes: 14.6%
Mail Ballots: 5.6%
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 12,023 75.27%
McAuliffe 3,888 24.34%
Blanding 55 0.34%
Estimated results for Pittsylvania County.
Pittsylvania County contains "split" precincts (*) for HD48. Explain
Pittsylvania County set up ballots in November 2021 in a way that made it impossible to allocate absentee ballots back to precincts where voters live. That required VPAP to estimate how absentee votes were distributed in the portion of Pittsylvania County that falls within HD48.


These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,717 73.53%
McAuliffe 612 26.21%
Blanding 6 0.26%

These are estimated results. Methodology
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 535 59.71%
Youngkin 352 39.29%
Blanding 8 0.89%
Disclaimer: Precinct results shown below include only ballots on Election Day and do not include early ballots, which generally are more heavily weighted with Democrats.

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 1,157 86.67%
McAuliffe 173 12.96%
Blanding 4 0.30%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 337 78.92%
McAuliffe 88 20.61%
Blanding 2 0.47%

This is a "split" precinct. Explain
Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 327 84.06%
McAuliffe 60 15.42%
Blanding 2 0.51%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 582 84.96%
McAuliffe 101 14.74%
Blanding 2 0.29%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 135 73.37%
McAuliffe 49 26.63%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 391 83.01%
McAuliffe 80 16.99%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 396 85.53%
McAuliffe 67 14.47%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 918 81.89%
McAuliffe 198 17.66%
Blanding 4 0.36%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
McAuliffe 207 51.24%
Youngkin 193 47.77%
Blanding 4 0.99%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 253 53.60%
McAuliffe 217 45.97%
Blanding 2 0.42%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 151 51.19%
McAuliffe 141 47.80%
Blanding 3 1.02%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 203 61.14%
McAuliffe 126 37.95%
Blanding 2 0.60%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 920 79.52%
McAuliffe 232 20.05%
Blanding 3 0.26%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 511 81.76%
McAuliffe 110 17.60%
Blanding 4 0.64%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 692 81.99%
McAuliffe 150 17.77%
Blanding 2 0.24%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 512 76.76%
McAuliffe 153 22.94%
Blanding 1 0.15%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 549 82.19%
McAuliffe 117 17.51%
Blanding 1 0.15%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 413 60.65%
McAuliffe 264 38.77%
Blanding 4 0.59%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 271 83.90%
McAuliffe 52 16.10%
Blanding 0 0.00%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 878 88.69%
McAuliffe 111 11.21%
Blanding 1 0.10%

Results limited to in-person votes cast on Election-Day.
Candidate Votes Percent Reporting
Youngkin 165 78.57%
McAuliffe 45 21.43%
Blanding 0 0.00%
In order to calculate the number of votes within each precinct split between two or more districts, VPAP uses the proportion of voters within that portion of the precinct, which is provided by locality registrars on a monthly basis. If voter registration data is unavailable, for example when redistricting occurs, then VPAP will use the proportion of voting age population within that portion of the precinct, calculated using Census block-level data.